Cloud VMS vs on-premise VMS
An honest comparison of cloud vms vs on-premise vms across the dimensions that matter most to security decision-makers. Both approaches have strengths, this table helps you decide which fits your facility.
| Cloud VMS | On-Premise VMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront cost | Low — subscription per camera | High — server hardware, NVR, licenses |
| Maintenance | Managed by provider — updates automatic | On-site IT team required for updates and repairs |
| Remote access | Native — access from any device, anywhere | VPN or port forwarding required |
| Multi-site | Centralized dashboard for all locations | Separate systems per site or complex networking |
| Scalability | Add cameras instantly | Hardware upgrade required at capacity |
| AI capabilities | Cloud-native AI processing | Limited — requires dedicated GPU hardware |
The bottom line
Neither approach is universally better. The right choice depends on your facility size, risk profile, budget, and existing infrastructure. Virtual patrolling is strongest where consistency, audit trails, and cost efficiency matter most — typically multi-site operations, after-hours coverage, and facilities where guard costs are the dominant security spend.
Use the ROI calculator to model the cost comparison for your specific scenario, or review pricing to understand the per-camera licensing model. The cloud video surveillance page describes the cloud side on its own.
Frequently asked questions
Ready to patrol your site 24/7?
Book a 15-minute demo and see a live patrol run on your own cameras.